Compare/Step 3.5 Flash 2603 vs GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)

Step 3.5 Flash 2603vsGPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

StepFun

Step 3.5 Flash 2603

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
187 tok/s
TTFT
0.87s
OpenAI

GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)

Input
$2.5/M
Output
$15/M
Speed
62 tok/s
TTFT
0.65s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Step 3.5 Flash 2603
Faster (tok/s)
Step 3.5 Flash 2603
Lower Latency
GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)
Benchmarks (4-3)
Step 3.5 Flash 2603

Pricing Comparison

MetricStep 3.5 Flash 2603GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)
Input ($/M tokens)$0$2.5
Output ($/M tokens)$0$15
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Step 3.5 Flash 2603$0.00
GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)$4.00

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Step 3.5 Flash 2603
187 tok/s
GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)
62 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Step 3.5 Flash 2603
0.87s
GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)
0.65s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
38.535.4
Coding Index
34.641.0
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
82.6%74.8%
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
22.6%10.6%
SciCode
38.5%47.1%
IFBench
66.5%48.4%
TerminalBench
32.6%37.9%
Step 3.5 Flash 26034 wins
3 winsGPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Step 3.5 Flash 2603 or GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)?

Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.00/M tokens vs $5.63/M for GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Step 3.5 Flash 2603 wins 4 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 3 for GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Step 3.5 Flash 2603 generates tokens faster at 187 tok/s vs 62 tok/s. However, GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (0.65s vs 0.87s).

When should I use Step 3.5 Flash 2603 vs GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)?

Choose based on your priorities: Step 3.5 Flash 2603 for lower cost, Step 3.5 Flash 2603 for stronger benchmark performance, and Step 3.5 Flash 2603 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.