Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Sarvam 105B (high) | Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.042 | $0.03 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.17 | $0.15 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.06/M tokens vs $0.07/M for Sarvam 105B (high).
Sarvam 105B (high) wins 4 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 3 for Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Sarvam 105B (high) generates tokens faster at 155 tok/s vs 28 tok/s. However, Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (0.42s vs 1.20s).
Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, Sarvam 105B (high) for stronger benchmark performance, and Sarvam 105B (high) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.