Compare/Sarvam 105B (high) vs Grok-1

Sarvam 105B (high)vsGrok-1

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Sarvam

Sarvam 105B (high)

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
131 tok/s
TTFT
1.26s
xAI

Grok-1

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Tie
Faster (tok/s)
Sarvam 105B (high)
Lower Latency
Grok-1
Benchmarks (7-0)
Sarvam 105B (high)

Pricing Comparison

MetricSarvam 105B (high)Grok-1
Input ($/M tokens)$0$0
Output ($/M tokens)$0$0
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Sarvam 105B (high)$0.00
Grok-1$0.00

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Sarvam 105B (high)
131 tok/s
Grok-1
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Sarvam 105B (high)
1.26s
Grok-1

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
18.211.7
Coding Index
9.8
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
73.8%
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
10.1%
SciCode
26.4%
IFBench
34.4%
TerminalBench
1.5%
Sarvam 105B (high)7 wins
0 winsGrok-1

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Sarvam 105B (high) or Grok-1?

Both models have similar pricing. Check the detailed breakdown above for input vs output token costs.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Sarvam 105B (high) wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Grok-1. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Sarvam 105B (high) generates tokens faster at 131 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. However, Grok-1 has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 1.26s).

When should I use Sarvam 105B (high) vs Grok-1?

Choose based on your priorities: both are similarly priced, Sarvam 105B (high) for stronger benchmark performance, and Sarvam 105B (high) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.