Compare/Ring-2.6-1T vs gpt-oss-120b (low)

Ring-2.6-1Tvsgpt-oss-120b (low)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

InclusionAI

Ring-2.6-1T

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT
OpenAI

gpt-oss-120b (low)

Input
$0.15/M
Output
$0.6/M
Speed
274 tok/s
TTFT
0.51s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Ring-2.6-1T
Faster (tok/s)
gpt-oss-120b (low)
Lower Latency
Ring-2.6-1T
Benchmarks (6-5)
Ring-2.6-1T

Pricing Comparison

MetricRing-2.6-1Tgpt-oss-120b (low)
Input ($/M tokens)$0$0.15
Output ($/M tokens)$0$0.6
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Ring-2.6-1T$0.00
gpt-oss-120b (low)$0.21

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Ring-2.6-1T
gpt-oss-120b (low)
274 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Ring-2.6-1T
gpt-oss-120b (low)
0.51s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
38.524.5
Coding Index
33.315.5
Math Index
66.7
GPQA Diamond
85.7%67.2%
MMLU-Pro
77.5%
LiveCodeBench
70.7%
AIME 2025
66.7%
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
18.3%5.2%
SciCode
42.4%36.0%
IFBench
44.6%58.3%
TerminalBench
28.8%5.3%
Ring-2.6-1T6 wins
5 winsgpt-oss-120b (low)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Ring-2.6-1T or gpt-oss-120b (low)?

Ring-2.6-1T is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.00/M tokens vs $0.26/M for gpt-oss-120b (low).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Ring-2.6-1T wins 6 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for gpt-oss-120b (low). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

gpt-oss-120b (low) generates tokens faster at 274 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. Ring-2.6-1T also has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 0.51s).

When should I use Ring-2.6-1T vs gpt-oss-120b (low)?

Choose based on your priorities: Ring-2.6-1T for lower cost, Ring-2.6-1T for stronger benchmark performance, and gpt-oss-120b (low) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.