Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.7 | $0.675 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $2.8 | $2.675 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $1.18/M tokens vs $1.23/M for Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct.
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 4 for Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) generates tokens faster at 179 tok/s vs 74 tok/s. However, Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (0.92s vs 1.18s).
Choose based on your priorities: Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) for lower cost, Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.