Compare/Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)vsKimi K2.7 Code

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Alibaba

Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)

Input
$0.6/M
Output
$3.6/M
Speed
60 tok/s
TTFT
1.40s
Kimi

Kimi K2.7 Code

Input
$0.95/M
Output
$4/M
Speed
40 tok/s
TTFT
1.35s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)
Faster (tok/s)
Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)
Lower Latency
Kimi K2.7 Code
Benchmarks (0-7)
Kimi K2.7 Code

Pricing Comparison

MetricQwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)Kimi K2.7 Code
Input ($/M tokens)$0.6$0.95
Output ($/M tokens)$3.6$4
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)$0.96
Kimi K2.7 Code$1.35

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)
60 tok/s
Kimi K2.7 Code
40 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)
1.40s
Kimi K2.7 Code
1.35s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
30.541.9
Coding Index
46.660.8
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
82.9%89.6%
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
13.6%32.8%
SciCode
37.3%47.5%
IFBench
45.7%63.1%
TerminalBench
21.2%44.7%
Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)0 wins
7 winsKimi K2.7 Code

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $1.35/M tokens vs $1.71/M for Kimi K2.7 Code.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Kimi K2.7 Code wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 60 tok/s vs 40 tok/s. However, Kimi K2.7 Code has lower time-to-first-token (1.35s vs 1.40s).

When should I use Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K2.7 Code?

Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, Kimi K2.7 Code for stronger benchmark performance, and Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.