Compare/Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning) vs Nova Micro

Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning)vsNova Micro

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Alibaba

Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning)

Input
$0.03/M
Output
$0.15/M
Speed
226 tok/s
TTFT
0.34s
Amazon

Nova Micro

Input
$0.035/M
Output
$0.14/M
Speed
293 tok/s
TTFT
0.37s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning)
Faster (tok/s)
Nova Micro
Lower Latency
Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning)
Benchmarks (7-5)
Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

MetricQwen3.5 4B (Reasoning)Nova Micro
Input ($/M tokens)$0.03$0.035
Output ($/M tokens)$0.15$0.14
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning)$0.04
Nova Micro$0.05

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning)
226 tok/s
Nova Micro
293 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning)
0.34s
Nova Micro
0.37s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
27.110.3
Coding Index
17.54.1
Math Index
6.0
GPQA Diamond
77.1%35.8%
MMLU-Pro
53.1%
LiveCodeBench
14.0%
AIME 2025
6.0%
MATH-500
70.3%
Humanity's Last Exam
7.8%4.7%
SciCode
16.1%9.4%
IFBench
52.0%29.4%
TerminalBench
18.2%1.5%
Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning)7 wins
5 winsNova Micro

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning) or Nova Micro?

Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.06/M tokens vs $0.06/M for Nova Micro.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning) wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for Nova Micro. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Nova Micro generates tokens faster at 293 tok/s vs 226 tok/s. Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.34s vs 0.37s).

When should I use Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning) vs Nova Micro?

Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning) for lower cost, Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Nova Micro for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.