Compare/Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning) vs Grok-1

Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning)vsGrok-1

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Alibaba

Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning)

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT
xAI

Grok-1

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Tie
Faster (tok/s)
Tie
Lower Latency
Tie
Benchmarks (11-0)
Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

MetricQwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning)Grok-1
Input ($/M tokens)$0$0
Output ($/M tokens)$0$0
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning)$0.00
Grok-1$0.00

Speed Comparison

Speed data not available for these models.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
18.211.7
Coding Index
9.5
Math Index
82.7
GPQA Diamond
66.7%
MMLU-Pro
74.3%
LiveCodeBench
64.1%
AIME 2025
82.7%
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
5.9%
SciCode
25.6%
IFBench
49.8%
TerminalBench
1.5%
Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning)11 wins
0 winsGrok-1

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning) or Grok-1?

Both models have similar pricing. Check the detailed breakdown above for input vs output token costs.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning) wins 11 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Grok-1. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Both models have comparable generation speeds.

When should I use Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning) vs Grok-1?

Choose based on your priorities: both are similarly priced, Qwen3 4B 2507 (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and both have comparable speed. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.