Compare/Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning) vs Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning)

Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning)vsHy3-preview (Non-reasoning)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Alibaba

Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning)

Input
$0.11/M
Output
$0.42/M
Speed
223 tok/s
TTFT
0.89s
Tencent

Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning)

Input
$0.123/M
Output
$0.43/M
Speed
120 tok/s
TTFT
2.86s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning)
Faster (tok/s)
Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning)
Lower Latency
Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning)
Benchmarks (5-7)
Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

MetricQwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning)Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning)
Input ($/M tokens)$0.11$0.123
Output ($/M tokens)$0.42$0.43
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning)$0.15
Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning)$0.17

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning)
223 tok/s
Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning)
120 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning)
0.89s
Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning)
2.86s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
5.733.7
Coding Index
1.434.3
Math Index
10.3
GPQA Diamond
23.1%73.2%
MMLU-Pro
23.1%
LiveCodeBench
7.3%
AIME 2025
10.3%
MATH-500
52.1%
Humanity's Last Exam
5.2%6.3%
SciCode
4.1%39.4%
IFBench
21.9%48.0%
TerminalBench
0.0%31.8%
Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning)5 wins
7 winsHy3-preview (Non-reasoning)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning) or Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning)?

Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.19/M tokens vs $0.20/M for Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning) wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 223 tok/s vs 120 tok/s. Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.89s vs 2.86s).

When should I use Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning) vs Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning)?

Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.