Compare/Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B vs Grok-1

Qwen2.5 Instruct 32BvsGrok-1

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Alibaba

Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT
xAI

Grok-1

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Tie
Faster (tok/s)
Tie
Lower Latency
Tie
Benchmarks (7-0)
Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B

Pricing Comparison

MetricQwen2.5 Instruct 32BGrok-1
Input ($/M tokens)$0$0
Output ($/M tokens)$0$0
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B$0.00
Grok-1$0.00

Speed Comparison

Speed data not available for these models.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
13.211.7
Coding Index
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
46.6%
MMLU-Pro
69.7%
LiveCodeBench
24.8%
AIME 2025
MATH-500
80.5%
Humanity's Last Exam
3.8%
SciCode
22.9%
IFBench
TerminalBench
Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B7 wins
0 winsGrok-1

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B or Grok-1?

Both models have similar pricing. Check the detailed breakdown above for input vs output token costs.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Grok-1. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Both models have comparable generation speeds.

When should I use Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B vs Grok-1?

Choose based on your priorities: both are similarly priced, Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B for stronger benchmark performance, and both have comparable speed. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.