Compare/Phi-4 vs Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B

Phi-4vsLlama 3.1 Instruct 70B

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Microsoft

Phi-4

Input
$0.125/M
Output
$0.5/M
Speed
38 tok/s
TTFT
0.52s
Meta

Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B

Input
$0.56/M
Output
$0.56/M
Speed
33 tok/s
TTFT
0.61s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Phi-4
Faster (tok/s)
Phi-4
Lower Latency
Phi-4
Benchmarks (6-5)
Phi-4

Pricing Comparison

MetricPhi-4Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
Input ($/M tokens)$0.125$0.56
Output ($/M tokens)$0.5$0.56
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Phi-4$0.17
Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B$0.62

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Phi-4
38 tok/s
Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
33 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Phi-4
0.52s
Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
0.61s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
4.96.8
Coding Index
Math Index
18.04.0
GPQA Diamond
57.5%40.9%
MMLU-Pro
71.4%67.6%
LiveCodeBench
23.1%23.2%
AIME 2025
18.0%4.0%
MATH-500
81.0%64.9%
Humanity's Last Exam
4.1%4.6%
SciCode
26.0%26.7%
IFBench
23.5%34.4%
TerminalBench
3.8%3.0%
Phi-46 wins
5 winsLlama 3.1 Instruct 70B

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Phi-4 or Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B?

Phi-4 is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.22/M tokens vs $0.56/M for Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Phi-4 wins 6 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Phi-4 generates tokens faster at 38 tok/s vs 33 tok/s. Phi-4 also has lower time-to-first-token (0.52s vs 0.61s).

When should I use Phi-4 vs Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B?

Choose based on your priorities: Phi-4 for lower cost, Phi-4 for stronger benchmark performance, and Phi-4 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.