Compare/Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct vs Grok-1

Olmo 3.1 32B InstructvsGrok-1

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Allen Institute for AI

Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT
xAI

Grok-1

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Tie
Faster (tok/s)
Tie
Lower Latency
Tie
Benchmarks (7-0)
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

MetricOlmo 3.1 32B InstructGrok-1
Input ($/M tokens)$0$0
Output ($/M tokens)$0$0
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct$0.00
Grok-1$0.00

Speed Comparison

Speed data not available for these models.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
12.211.7
Coding Index
5.6
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
53.9%
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
4.9%
SciCode
16.7%
IFBench
39.2%
TerminalBench
0.0%
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct7 wins
0 winsGrok-1

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct or Grok-1?

Both models have similar pricing. Check the detailed breakdown above for input vs output token costs.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Grok-1. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Both models have comparable generation speeds.

When should I use Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct vs Grok-1?

Choose based on your priorities: both are similarly priced, Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct for stronger benchmark performance, and both have comparable speed. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.