Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.68 | $0.3 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $2.67 | $2.5 |
Verdict. Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) wins the overall benchmark matchup 1–0 across 1 overlapping categories, but raw benchmark score is only one input to the decision.
Pricing. Both models sit in the budget bracket for output-token pricing. At 1.1× the per-million-token cost, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is meaningfully cheaper if your traffic is output-heavy (long completions, document generation, agent loops). Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite makes more sense when output volume is low and absolute reasoning quality justifies the premium.
Strengths. Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) is strongest on Coding Index (49.3), Intelligence Index (38.3). Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads on Coding Index (49.3), Intelligence Index (37.4).
Speed. On throughput, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite generates tokens at 391 tok/s versus 159 tok/s — about 59% faster. On time-to-first-token, Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) responds in 2720ms vs 6980ms, which matters most for chat-style UIs.
Provider. NVIDIA and Google sell to overlapping but distinct developer audiences: NVIDIA tends to ship frontier reasoning models with premium positioning, while Google often prices more aggressively. Your existing vendor relationships, billing, and SLA preferences may matter as much as the raw numbers above.
Workload cost. Workload scenarios (per million requests at 30M input + 15M output tokens): Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) costs $60.45 ($725/year); Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite costs $46.50 ($558/year). At a smaller 5M-input/2M-output scale (single-developer tool or prototype): Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) ≈ $8.74/run, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite ≈ $6.50/run. At agent/realtime scale (200M input / 100M output per million requests): Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) ≈ $403/run, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite ≈ $310/run. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite becomes more attractive at higher volume — the absolute per-token pricing difference compounds when you ship at scale.
Recommendation. Both models have legitimate use cases — the right answer depends on whether you are optimizing for benchmark ceiling, latency, or unit cost. Start with the cheaper / faster model, evaluate against your specific task, and only switch if the upgrade shows a meaningful lift.
Head-to-head deltas
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.85/M tokens vs $1.18/M for Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning).
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) wins 1 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite generates tokens faster at 391 tok/s vs 159 tok/s. Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) also has lower time-to-first-token (2.72s vs 6.98s).
Choose based on your priorities: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite for lower cost, Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.