Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) | Qwen3.5 Omni Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.25 | $0.1 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.775 | $0.8 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.28/M tokens vs $0.38/M for NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning).
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Qwen3.5 Omni Flash. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash generates tokens faster at 249 tok/s vs 152 tok/s. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.98s vs 1.06s).
Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3.5 Omni Flash for lower cost, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Qwen3.5 Omni Flash for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.