Compare/MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

MiniMax-M2.7vsQwen3.7 Plus

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

MiniMax

MiniMax-M2.7

Input
$0.3/M
Output
$1.2/M
Speed
51 tok/s
TTFT
1.45s
Alibaba

Qwen3.7 Plus

Input
$0.4/M
Output
$1.6/M
Speed
49 tok/s
TTFT
2.37s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
MiniMax-M2.7
Faster (tok/s)
MiniMax-M2.7
Lower Latency
MiniMax-M2.7
Benchmarks (1-6)
Qwen3.7 Plus

Pricing Comparison

MetricMiniMax-M2.7Qwen3.7 Plus
Input ($/M tokens)$0.3$0.4
Output ($/M tokens)$1.2$1.6
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
MiniMax-M2.7$0.42
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.56

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
MiniMax-M2.7
51 tok/s
Qwen3.7 Plus
49 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
MiniMax-M2.7
1.45s
Qwen3.7 Plus
2.37s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
38.139.0
Coding Index
52.655.9
Math Index
——
GPQA Diamond
87.4%90.0%
MMLU-Pro
——
LiveCodeBench
——
AIME 2025
——
MATH-500
——
Humanity's Last Exam
28.1%33.4%
SciCode
47.0%45.5%
IFBench
75.7%78.0%
TerminalBench
39.4%47.0%
MiniMax-M2.71 wins
6 winsQwen3.7 Plus

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2.7 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

MiniMax-M2.7 is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.53/M tokens vs $0.70/M for Qwen3.7 Plus.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Qwen3.7 Plus wins 6 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 1 for MiniMax-M2.7. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

MiniMax-M2.7 generates tokens faster at 51 tok/s vs 49 tok/s. MiniMax-M2.7 also has lower time-to-first-token (1.45s vs 2.37s).

When should I use MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.7 Plus?

Choose based on your priorities: MiniMax-M2.7 for lower cost, Qwen3.7 Plus for stronger benchmark performance, and MiniMax-M2.7 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.

More Comparisons

← All comparisons·Full benchmark table·Cost calculator