Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | MiniMax-M2.5 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.3 | $1.2 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $1.2 | $1.2 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
MiniMax-M2.5 is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.53/M tokens vs $1.20/M for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B.
MiniMax-M2.5 wins 6 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B generates tokens faster at 303 tok/s vs 73 tok/s. MiniMax-M2.5 also has lower time-to-first-token (1.37s vs 4.03s).
Choose based on your priorities: MiniMax-M2.5 for lower cost, MiniMax-M2.5 for stronger benchmark performance, and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.