Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.661 | $0.6 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $1.722 | $1.8 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.90/M tokens vs $0.93/M for MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning).
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) wins 6 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 54 tok/s vs 52 tok/s. However, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (0.71s vs 1.40s).
Choose based on your priorities: Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) for lower cost, MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.