Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.36 | $0.45 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $1.8 | $1.8 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.72/M tokens vs $0.79/M for Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning).
MiMo-V2.5 wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
MiMo-V2.5 generates tokens faster at 89 tok/s vs 67 tok/s. However, Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (1.10s vs 2.23s).
Choose based on your priorities: MiMo-V2.5 for lower cost, MiMo-V2.5 for stronger benchmark performance, and MiMo-V2.5 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.