Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.36 | $0.6 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $1.8 | $1.8 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.72/M tokens vs $0.90/M for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning).
MiMo-V2.5 wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
MiMo-V2.5 generates tokens faster at 89 tok/s vs 42 tok/s. However, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (0.74s vs 2.23s).
Choose based on your priorities: MiMo-V2.5 for lower cost, MiMo-V2.5 for stronger benchmark performance, and MiMo-V2.5 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.