Compare/Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B vs Mercury 2

Llama 3.3 Instruct 70BvsMercury 2

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Meta

Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B

Input
$0.58/M
Output
$0.71/M
Speed
88 tok/s
TTFT
0.65s
Inception

Mercury 2

Input
$0.25/M
Output
$0.75/M
Speed
1108 tok/s
TTFT
3.08s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Mercury 2
Faster (tok/s)
Mercury 2
Lower Latency
Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B
Benchmarks (6-6)
Tie

Pricing Comparison

MetricLlama 3.3 Instruct 70BMercury 2
Input ($/M tokens)$0.58$0.25
Output ($/M tokens)$0.71$0.75
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B$0.65
Mercury 2$0.33

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B
88 tok/s
Mercury 2
1108 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B
0.65s
Mercury 2
3.08s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
9.425.3
Coding Index
11.9
Math Index
7.7
GPQA Diamond
49.8%77.0%
MMLU-Pro
71.3%
LiveCodeBench
28.8%
AIME 2025
7.7%
MATH-500
77.3%
Humanity's Last Exam
4.0%15.5%
SciCode
26.0%38.7%
IFBench
47.1%69.8%
TerminalBench
3.0%26.5%
Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B6 wins
6 winsMercury 2

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B or Mercury 2?

Mercury 2 is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.38/M tokens vs $0.61/M for Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

It's a tie — both models win 6 benchmarks each across 12 evaluated categories. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Mercury 2 generates tokens faster at 1108 tok/s vs 88 tok/s. Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B also has lower time-to-first-token (0.65s vs 3.08s).

When should I use Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B vs Mercury 2?

Choose based on your priorities: Mercury 2 for lower cost, both perform similarly on benchmarks, and Mercury 2 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.