Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Llama 3.2 Instruct 1B | Sarvam 30B (high) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.05 | $0.026 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.05 | $0.11 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Sarvam 30B (high) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.05/M tokens vs $0.05/M for Llama 3.2 Instruct 1B.
Sarvam 30B (high) wins 6 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for Llama 3.2 Instruct 1B. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Sarvam 30B (high) generates tokens faster at 232 tok/s vs 87 tok/s. Llama 3.2 Instruct 1B also has lower time-to-first-token (0.58s vs 1.16s).
Choose based on your priorities: Sarvam 30B (high) for lower cost, Sarvam 30B (high) for stronger benchmark performance, and Sarvam 30B (high) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.