Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) | MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.345 | $0.1 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.345 | $0.3 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.15/M tokens vs $0.34/M for Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision).
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) wins 6 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) generates tokens faster at 65 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. However, MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 0.58s).
Choose based on your priorities: MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) for lower cost, MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) for stronger benchmark performance, and Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.