Compare/Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) vs Grok-1

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning)vsGrok-1

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

NVIDIA

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning)

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT
xAI

Grok-1

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Tie
Faster (tok/s)
Tie
Lower Latency
Tie
Benchmarks (10-0)
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

MetricLlama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning)Grok-1
Input ($/M tokens)$0$0
Output ($/M tokens)$0$0
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning)$0.00
Grok-1$0.00

Speed Comparison

Speed data not available for these models.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
14.411.7
Coding Index
Math Index
50.0
GPQA Diamond
40.8%
MMLU-Pro
55.6%
LiveCodeBench
49.3%
AIME 2025
50.0%
MATH-500
94.7%
Humanity's Last Exam
5.1%
SciCode
10.1%
IFBench
25.5%
TerminalBench
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning)10 wins
0 winsGrok-1

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) or Grok-1?

Both models have similar pricing. Check the detailed breakdown above for input vs output token costs.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) wins 10 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Grok-1. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Both models have comparable generation speeds.

When should I use Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) vs Grok-1?

Choose based on your priorities: both are similarly priced, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and both have comparable speed. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.