Compare/Ling-mini-2.0 vs Grok-1

Ling-mini-2.0vsGrok-1

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

InclusionAI

Ling-mini-2.0

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT
xAI

Grok-1

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Tie
Faster (tok/s)
Tie
Lower Latency
Tie
Benchmarks (10-1)
Ling-mini-2.0

Pricing Comparison

MetricLing-mini-2.0Grok-1
Input ($/M tokens)$0$0
Output ($/M tokens)$0$0
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Ling-mini-2.0$0.00
Grok-1$0.00

Speed Comparison

Speed data not available for these models.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
9.211.7
Coding Index
5.0
Math Index
49.3
GPQA Diamond
56.2%
MMLU-Pro
67.1%
LiveCodeBench
42.9%
AIME 2025
49.3%
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
5.0%
SciCode
13.5%
IFBench
23.6%
TerminalBench
0.8%
Ling-mini-2.010 wins
1 winsGrok-1

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Ling-mini-2.0 or Grok-1?

Both models have similar pricing. Check the detailed breakdown above for input vs output token costs.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Ling-mini-2.0 wins 10 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 1 for Grok-1. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Both models have comparable generation speeds.

When should I use Ling-mini-2.0 vs Grok-1?

Choose based on your priorities: both are similarly priced, Ling-mini-2.0 for stronger benchmark performance, and both have comparable speed. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.