Compare/Ling-2.6-1T vs Grok 4.3 (high)

Ling-2.6-1TvsGrok 4.3 (high)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

InclusionAI

Ling-2.6-1T

Input
$0.3/M
Output
$2.5/M
Speed
TTFT
xAI

Grok 4.3 (high)

Input
$1.25/M
Output
$2.5/M
Speed
94 tok/s
TTFT
7.51s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Ling-2.6-1T
Faster (tok/s)
Grok 4.3 (high)
Lower Latency
Ling-2.6-1T
Benchmarks (0-7)
Grok 4.3 (high)

Pricing Comparison

MetricLing-2.6-1TGrok 4.3 (high)
Input ($/M tokens)$0.3$1.25
Output ($/M tokens)$2.5$2.5
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Ling-2.6-1T$0.55
Grok 4.3 (high)$1.50

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Ling-2.6-1T
Grok 4.3 (high)
94 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Ling-2.6-1T
Grok 4.3 (high)
7.51s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
33.653.2
Coding Index
33.141.0
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
75.2%90.1%
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
8.2%35.0%
SciCode
37.0%47.3%
IFBench
56.9%81.3%
TerminalBench
31.1%37.9%
Ling-2.6-1T0 wins
7 winsGrok 4.3 (high)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Ling-2.6-1T or Grok 4.3 (high)?

Ling-2.6-1T is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.85/M tokens vs $1.56/M for Grok 4.3 (high).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Grok 4.3 (high) wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Ling-2.6-1T. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Grok 4.3 (high) generates tokens faster at 94 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. Ling-2.6-1T also has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 7.51s).

When should I use Ling-2.6-1T vs Grok 4.3 (high)?

Choose based on your priorities: Ling-2.6-1T for lower cost, Grok 4.3 (high) for stronger benchmark performance, and Grok 4.3 (high) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.