Compare/Ling-1T vs gpt-oss-120B (high)

Ling-1Tvsgpt-oss-120B (high)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

InclusionAI

Ling-1T

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT
OpenAI

gpt-oss-120B (high)

Input
$0.15/M
Output
$0.6/M
Speed
235 tok/s
TTFT
0.50s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Ling-1T
Faster (tok/s)
gpt-oss-120B (high)
Lower Latency
Ling-1T
Benchmarks (1-10)
gpt-oss-120B (high)

Pricing Comparison

MetricLing-1Tgpt-oss-120B (high)
Input ($/M tokens)$0$0.15
Output ($/M tokens)$0$0.6
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Ling-1T$0.00
gpt-oss-120B (high)$0.21

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Ling-1T
gpt-oss-120B (high)
235 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Ling-1T
gpt-oss-120B (high)
0.50s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
19.033.3
Coding Index
18.828.6
Math Index
71.393.4
GPQA Diamond
71.9%78.2%
MMLU-Pro
82.2%80.8%
LiveCodeBench
67.7%87.8%
AIME 2025
71.3%93.4%
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
7.2%18.5%
SciCode
35.2%38.9%
IFBench
34.8%69.0%
TerminalBench
10.6%23.5%
Ling-1T1 wins
10 winsgpt-oss-120B (high)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Ling-1T or gpt-oss-120B (high)?

Ling-1T is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.00/M tokens vs $0.26/M for gpt-oss-120B (high).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

gpt-oss-120B (high) wins 10 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 1 for Ling-1T. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

gpt-oss-120B (high) generates tokens faster at 235 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. Ling-1T also has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 0.50s).

When should I use Ling-1T vs gpt-oss-120B (high)?

Choose based on your priorities: Ling-1T for lower cost, gpt-oss-120B (high) for stronger benchmark performance, and gpt-oss-120B (high) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.