Compare/Kimi K2 Thinking vs Grok 4.3 (low)

Kimi K2 ThinkingvsGrok 4.3 (low)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Kimi

Kimi K2 Thinking

Input
$0.6/M
Output
$2.5/M
Speed
168 tok/s
TTFT
0.78s
SpaceXAI

Grok 4.3 (low)

Input
$1.25/M
Output
$2.5/M
Speed
99 tok/s
TTFT
7.92s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Kimi K2 Thinking
Faster (tok/s)
Kimi K2 Thinking
Lower Latency
Kimi K2 Thinking
Benchmarks (7-3)
Kimi K2 Thinking

Pricing Comparison

MetricKimi K2 ThinkingGrok 4.3 (low)
Input ($/M tokens)$0.6$1.25
Output ($/M tokens)$2.5$2.5
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Kimi K2 Thinking$0.85
Grok 4.3 (low)$1.50

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Kimi K2 Thinking
168 tok/s
Grok 4.3 (low)
99 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Kimi K2 Thinking
0.78s
Grok 4.3 (low)
7.92s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
32.735.4
Coding Index
Math Index
94.7
GPQA Diamond
83.8%84.3%
MMLU-Pro
84.8%
LiveCodeBench
85.3%
AIME 2025
94.7%
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
22.3%17.3%
SciCode
42.4%41.9%
IFBench
68.1%81.0%
TerminalBench
31.1%26.5%
Kimi K2 Thinking7 wins
3 winsGrok 4.3 (low)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2 Thinking or Grok 4.3 (low)?

Kimi K2 Thinking is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $1.07/M tokens vs $1.56/M for Grok 4.3 (low).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Kimi K2 Thinking wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 3 for Grok 4.3 (low). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Kimi K2 Thinking generates tokens faster at 168 tok/s vs 99 tok/s. Kimi K2 Thinking also has lower time-to-first-token (0.78s vs 7.92s).

When should I use Kimi K2 Thinking vs Grok 4.3 (low)?

Choose based on your priorities: Kimi K2 Thinking for lower cost, Kimi K2 Thinking for stronger benchmark performance, and Kimi K2 Thinking for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.