Compare/K2 Horizon 375B A23B vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

K2 Horizon 375B A23BvsMiMo-V2.5-Pro

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

MBZUAI Institute of Foundation Models

K2 Horizon 375B A23B

Input
Output
Speed
TTFT
Xiaomi

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Input
$0.43/M
Output
$0.87/M
Speed
35 tok/s
TTFT
4.07s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Faster (tok/s)
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Lower Latency
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Benchmarks (2-0)
K2 Horizon 375B A23B

Pricing Comparison

MetricK2 Horizon 375B A23BMiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input ($/M tokens)$0.43
Output ($/M tokens)$0.87
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
MiMo-V2.5-Pro$0.52

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
K2 Horizon 375B A23B
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
35 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
K2 Horizon 375B A23B
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
4.07s

Editorial Analysis

Verdict. K2 Horizon 375B A23B wins the overall benchmark matchup 2–0 across 2 overlapping categories, but raw benchmark score is only one input to the decision.

Pricing. Pricing varies significantly between these models — check the table above for the exact per-token rates. Many production workloads actually surface input-token cost (retrieval-augmented prompts, code-context windows), so factor both directions.

Strengths. K2 Horizon 375B A23B is strongest on Coding Index (61.5), Intelligence Index (47.3). MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads on Coding Index (60.2), Intelligence Index (42.9).

Speed. Speed data is incomplete for this pair; benchmark and price should decide.

Provider. MBZUAI Institute of Foundation Models and Xiaomi sell to overlapping but distinct developer audiences: MBZUAI Institute of Foundation Models tends to ship frontier reasoning models with premium positioning, while Xiaomi often prices more aggressively. Your existing vendor relationships, billing, and SLA preferences may matter as much as the raw numbers above.

Recommendation. Both models have legitimate use cases — the right answer depends on whether you are optimizing for benchmark ceiling, latency, or unit cost. Start with the cheaper / faster model, evaluate against your specific task, and only switch if the upgrade shows a meaningful lift.

Head-to-head deltas

  • Aggregate benchmark score (sum across 12 categories, capped at 100): K2 Horizon 375B A23B = 109, MiMo-V2.5-Pro = 103. Within 15% — effectively equivalent if both meet the threshold your product requires.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
47.342.9
Coding Index
61.560.2
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
SciCode
IFBench
TerminalBench
K2 Horizon 375B A23B2 wins
0 winsMiMo-V2.5-Pro

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, K2 Horizon 375B A23B or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.54/M tokens vs $—/M for K2 Horizon 375B A23B.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

K2 Horizon 375B A23B wins 2 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro generates tokens faster at 35 tok/s vs — tok/s. However, MiMo-V2.5-Pro has lower time-to-first-token (4.07s vs —s).

When should I use K2 Horizon 375B A23B vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Choose based on your priorities: MiMo-V2.5-Pro for lower cost, K2 Horizon 375B A23B for stronger benchmark performance, and MiMo-V2.5-Pro for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.