Compare/K-EXAONE (Reasoning) vs Grok-1

K-EXAONE (Reasoning)vsGrok-1

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

LG AI Research

K-EXAONE (Reasoning)

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT
xAI

Grok-1

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Tie
Faster (tok/s)
Tie
Lower Latency
Tie
Benchmarks (11-0)
K-EXAONE (Reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

MetricK-EXAONE (Reasoning)Grok-1
Input ($/M tokens)$0$0
Output ($/M tokens)$0$0
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
K-EXAONE (Reasoning)$0.00
Grok-1$0.00

Speed Comparison

Speed data not available for these models.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
32.111.7
Coding Index
27.0
Math Index
90.3
GPQA Diamond
78.3%
MMLU-Pro
83.8%
LiveCodeBench
76.8%
AIME 2025
90.3%
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
13.1%
SciCode
35.6%
IFBench
64.7%
TerminalBench
22.7%
K-EXAONE (Reasoning)11 wins
0 winsGrok-1

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, K-EXAONE (Reasoning) or Grok-1?

Both models have similar pricing. Check the detailed breakdown above for input vs output token costs.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

K-EXAONE (Reasoning) wins 11 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Grok-1. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Both models have comparable generation speeds.

When should I use K-EXAONE (Reasoning) vs Grok-1?

Choose based on your priorities: both are similarly priced, K-EXAONE (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and both have comparable speed. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.