Compare/K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning) vs o3

K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning)vso3

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

LG AI Research

K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning)

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT
OpenAI

o3

Input
$2/M
Output
$8/M
Speed
125 tok/s
TTFT
6.65s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning)
Faster (tok/s)
o3
Lower Latency
K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning)
Benchmarks (0-11)
o3

Pricing Comparison

MetricK-EXAONE (Non-reasoning)o3
Input ($/M tokens)$0$2
Output ($/M tokens)$0$8
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning)$0.00
o3$2.80

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning)
o3
125 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning)
o3
6.65s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
16.730.4
Coding Index
Math Index
44.088.3
GPQA Diamond
69.5%82.7%
MMLU-Pro
81.0%85.3%
LiveCodeBench
80.8%
AIME 2025
44.0%88.3%
MATH-500
99.2%
Humanity's Last Exam
5.4%20.0%
SciCode
27.0%41.0%
IFBench
39.6%71.4%
TerminalBench
6.8%37.1%
K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning)0 wins
11 winso3

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning) or o3?

K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.00/M tokens vs $3.50/M for o3.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

o3 wins 11 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

o3 generates tokens faster at 125 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 6.65s).

When should I use K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning) vs o3?

Choose based on your priorities: K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, o3 for stronger benchmark performance, and o3 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.