Compare/HyperNova 60B 2605 vs Nova Micro

HyperNova 60B 2605vsNova Micro

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Multiverse Computing

HyperNova 60B 2605

Input
$0.04/M
Output
$0.14/M
Speed
355 tok/s
TTFT
0.76s
Amazon

Nova Micro

Input
$0.035/M
Output
$0.14/M
Speed
341 tok/s
TTFT
0.64s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Nova Micro
Faster (tok/s)
HyperNova 60B 2605
Lower Latency
Nova Micro
Benchmarks (7-5)
HyperNova 60B 2605

Pricing Comparison

MetricHyperNova 60B 2605Nova Micro
Input ($/M tokens)$0.04$0.035
Output ($/M tokens)$0.14$0.14
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
HyperNova 60B 2605$0.05
Nova Micro$0.05

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
HyperNova 60B 2605
355 tok/s
Nova Micro
341 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
HyperNova 60B 2605
0.76s
Nova Micro
0.64s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
17.84.7
Coding Index
23.2
Math Index
6.0
GPQA Diamond
73.3%35.8%
MMLU-Pro
53.1%
LiveCodeBench
14.0%
AIME 2025
6.0%
MATH-500
70.3%
Humanity's Last Exam
15.1%4.7%
SciCode
33.0%9.4%
IFBench
66.5%29.4%
TerminalBench
23.5%1.5%
HyperNova 60B 26057 wins
5 winsNova Micro

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, HyperNova 60B 2605 or Nova Micro?

Nova Micro is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.06/M tokens vs $0.07/M for HyperNova 60B 2605.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

HyperNova 60B 2605 wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for Nova Micro. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

HyperNova 60B 2605 generates tokens faster at 355 tok/s vs 341 tok/s. However, Nova Micro has lower time-to-first-token (0.64s vs 0.76s).

When should I use HyperNova 60B 2605 vs Nova Micro?

Choose based on your priorities: Nova Micro for lower cost, HyperNova 60B 2605 for stronger benchmark performance, and HyperNova 60B 2605 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.