Compare/Granite 4.2 8B vs Nova Lite

Granite 4.2 8BvsNova Lite

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

IBM

Granite 4.2 8B

Input
$0.06/M
Output
$0.25/M
Speed
144 tok/s
TTFT
0.62s
Amazon

Nova Lite

Input
$0.06/M
Output
$0.24/M
Speed
173 tok/s
TTFT
0.93s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Nova Lite
Faster (tok/s)
Nova Lite
Lower Latency
Granite 4.2 8B
Benchmarks (2-0)
Granite 4.2 8B

Pricing Comparison

MetricGranite 4.2 8BNova Lite
Input ($/M tokens)$0.06$0.06
Output ($/M tokens)$0.25$0.24
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Granite 4.2 8B$0.08
Nova Lite$0.08

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Granite 4.2 8B
144 tok/s
Nova Lite
173 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Granite 4.2 8B
0.62s
Nova Lite
0.93s

Editorial Analysis

Verdict. Granite 4.2 8B wins the overall benchmark matchup 2–0 across 2 overlapping categories, but raw benchmark score is only one input to the decision.

Pricing. Both models sit in the budget bracket for output-token pricing. At 1.0× the per-million-token cost, Nova Lite is meaningfully cheaper if your traffic is output-heavy (long completions, document generation, agent loops). Nova Lite makes more sense when output volume is low and absolute reasoning quality justifies the premium.

Strengths. Granite 4.2 8B is strongest on Coding Index (22.4), Intelligence Index (19.6). Nova Lite leads on Intelligence Index (6.7).

Speed. Throughput is comparable — 144 tok/s vs 173 tok/s — so generation speed shouldn't drive your choice here. Look at the per-benchmark wins instead.

Provider. IBM and Amazon sell to overlapping but distinct developer audiences: IBM tends to ship frontier reasoning models with premium positioning, while Amazon often prices more aggressively. Your existing vendor relationships, billing, and SLA preferences may matter as much as the raw numbers above.

Workload cost. Workload scenarios (per million requests at 30M input + 15M output tokens): Granite 4.2 8B costs $5.55 ($67/year); Nova Lite costs $5.40 ($65/year). At a smaller 5M-input/2M-output scale (single-developer tool or prototype): Granite 4.2 8B ≈ $0.80/run, Nova Lite ≈ $0.78/run. At agent/realtime scale (200M input / 100M output per million requests): Granite 4.2 8B ≈ $37/run, Nova Lite ≈ $36/run. Nova Lite becomes more attractive at higher volume — the absolute per-token pricing difference compounds when you ship at scale.

Recommendation. Both models have legitimate use cases — the right answer depends on whether you are optimizing for benchmark ceiling, latency, or unit cost. Start with the cheaper / faster model, evaluate against your specific task, and only switch if the upgrade shows a meaningful lift.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
19.66.7
Coding Index
22.4
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
SciCode
IFBench
TerminalBench
Granite 4.2 8B2 wins
0 winsNova Lite

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or Nova Lite?

Nova Lite is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.10/M tokens vs $0.11/M for Granite 4.2 8B.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Granite 4.2 8B wins 2 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Nova Lite. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Nova Lite generates tokens faster at 173 tok/s vs 144 tok/s. Granite 4.2 8B also has lower time-to-first-token (0.62s vs 0.93s).

When should I use Granite 4.2 8B vs Nova Lite?

Choose based on your priorities: Nova Lite for lower cost, Granite 4.2 8B for stronger benchmark performance, and Nova Lite for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.