Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning) | Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $5 | $6.25 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $30 | $25 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $10.94/M tokens vs $11.25/M for GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning).
GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning) wins 4 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 3 for Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 58 tok/s vs 43 tok/s. GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.96s vs 1.58s).
Choose based on your priorities: Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) for lower cost, GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.