Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | GPT-4o (Nov '24) | Claude Sonnet 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $2.5 | $2 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $10 | $10 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Claude Sonnet 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $4.00/M tokens vs $4.38/M for GPT-4o (Nov '24).
GPT-4o (Nov '24) wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for Claude Sonnet 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
GPT-4o (Nov '24) generates tokens faster at 198 tok/s vs 87 tok/s. GPT-4o (Nov '24) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.51s vs 134.45s).
Choose based on your priorities: Claude Sonnet 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) for lower cost, GPT-4o (Nov '24) for stronger benchmark performance, and GPT-4o (Nov '24) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.