Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) | DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.3 | $0.435 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.9 | $0.87 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.45/M tokens vs $0.54/M for DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort).
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort) wins 6 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 4 for GLM-4.6V (Reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort) generates tokens faster at 64 tok/s vs 45 tok/s. However, DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort) has lower time-to-first-token (1.13s vs 1.17s).
Choose based on your priorities: GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) for lower cost, DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort) for stronger benchmark performance, and DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.