Compare/Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs Grok-1

Gemma 3n E2B InstructvsGrok-1

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Google

Gemma 3n E2B Instruct

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT
xAI

Grok-1

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Tie
Faster (tok/s)
Tie
Lower Latency
Tie
Benchmarks (11-1)
Gemma 3n E2B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

MetricGemma 3n E2B InstructGrok-1
Input ($/M tokens)$0$0
Output ($/M tokens)$0$0
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Gemma 3n E2B Instruct$0.00
Grok-1$0.00

Speed Comparison

Speed data not available for these models.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
4.811.7
Coding Index
2.2
Math Index
10.3
GPQA Diamond
22.9%
MMLU-Pro
37.8%
LiveCodeBench
9.5%
AIME 2025
10.3%
MATH-500
69.1%
Humanity's Last Exam
4.0%
SciCode
5.2%
IFBench
22.0%
TerminalBench
0.8%
Gemma 3n E2B Instruct11 wins
1 winsGrok-1

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3n E2B Instruct or Grok-1?

Both models have similar pricing. Check the detailed breakdown above for input vs output token costs.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B Instruct wins 11 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 1 for Grok-1. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Both models have comparable generation speeds.

When should I use Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs Grok-1?

Choose based on your priorities: both are similarly priced, Gemma 3n E2B Instruct for stronger benchmark performance, and both have comparable speed. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.