Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Non-reasoning) | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.1 | $0.1 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.4 | $0.4 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Both models have similar pricing. Check the detailed breakdown above for input vs output token costs.
GPT-4.1 nano wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 274 tok/s vs 142 tok/s. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Non-reasoning) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.28s vs 0.40s).
Choose based on your priorities: both are similarly priced, GPT-4.1 nano for stronger benchmark performance, and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.