Compare/EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning) vs Grok-1

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)vsGrok-1

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

LG AI Research

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT
xAI

Grok-1

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Tie
Faster (tok/s)
Tie
Lower Latency
Tie
Benchmarks (11-0)
EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

MetricEXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)Grok-1
Input ($/M tokens)$0$0
Output ($/M tokens)$0$0
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)$0.00
Grok-1$0.00

Speed Comparison

Speed data not available for these models.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
11.711.7
Coding Index
9.4
Math Index
39.3
GPQA Diamond
62.8%
MMLU-Pro
76.8%
LiveCodeBench
47.2%
AIME 2025
39.3%
MATH-500
93.9%
Humanity's Last Exam
4.9%
SciCode
25.2%
IFBench
33.5%
TerminalBench
1.5%
EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)11 wins
0 winsGrok-1

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning) or Grok-1?

Both models have similar pricing. Check the detailed breakdown above for input vs output token costs.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning) wins 11 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Grok-1. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Both models have comparable generation speeds.

When should I use EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning) vs Grok-1?

Choose based on your priorities: both are similarly priced, EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and both have comparable speed. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.