Compare/Devstral 2 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Devstral 2vsMiMo-V2.5-Pro

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Mistral

Devstral 2

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
119 tok/s
TTFT
2.33s
Xiaomi

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Input
$0.43/M
Output
$0.87/M
Speed
35 tok/s
TTFT
4.07s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Devstral 2
Faster (tok/s)
Devstral 2
Lower Latency
Devstral 2
Benchmarks (0-2)
MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Pricing Comparison

MetricDevstral 2MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input ($/M tokens)$0$0.43
Output ($/M tokens)$0$0.87
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Devstral 2$0.00
MiMo-V2.5-Pro$0.52

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Devstral 2
119 tok/s
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
35 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Devstral 2
2.33s
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
4.07s

Editorial Analysis

Verdict. MiMo-V2.5-Pro takes the aggregate benchmark matchup 2–0 across 2 categories. Real workloads usually care about a handful of specific tasks — see the per-benchmark table above.

Pricing. Pricing varies significantly between these models — check the table above for the exact per-token rates. Many production workloads actually surface input-token cost (retrieval-augmented prompts, code-context windows), so factor both directions.

Strengths. Devstral 2 is strongest on Coding Index (31.3), Intelligence Index (19.2). MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads on Coding Index (60.2), Intelligence Index (42.9).

Speed. On throughput, Devstral 2 generates tokens at 119 tok/s versus 35 tok/s — about 70% faster. On time-to-first-token, Devstral 2 responds in 2330ms vs 4070ms, which matters most for chat-style UIs.

Provider. Mistral and Xiaomi sell to overlapping but distinct developer audiences: Mistral tends to ship frontier reasoning models with premium positioning, while Xiaomi often prices more aggressively. Your existing vendor relationships, billing, and SLA preferences may matter as much as the raw numbers above.

Workload cost. Workload scenarios (per million requests at 30M input + 15M output tokens): Devstral 2 costs $0.00 ($0/year); MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $25.95 ($311/year). At a smaller 5M-input/2M-output scale (single-developer tool or prototype): Devstral 2 ≈ $0.00/run, MiMo-V2.5-Pro ≈ $3.89/run. At agent/realtime scale (200M input / 100M output per million requests): Devstral 2 ≈ $0/run, MiMo-V2.5-Pro ≈ $173/run. Devstral 2 becomes more attractive at higher volume — the absolute per-token pricing difference compounds when you ship at scale.

Recommendation. Both models have legitimate use cases — the right answer depends on whether you are optimizing for benchmark ceiling, latency, or unit cost. Start with the cheaper / faster model, evaluate against your specific task, and only switch if the upgrade shows a meaningful lift.

Head-to-head deltas

  • On throughput, Devstral 2 is 3.35× faster (119 tok/s vs 35 tok/s). For streaming chat or real-time agents this alone often flips the recommendation.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
19.242.9
Coding Index
31.360.2
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
SciCode
IFBench
TerminalBench
Devstral 20 wins
2 winsMiMo-V2.5-Pro

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Devstral 2 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Devstral 2 is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.00/M tokens vs $0.54/M for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro wins 2 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Devstral 2. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Devstral 2 generates tokens faster at 119 tok/s vs 35 tok/s. Devstral 2 also has lower time-to-first-token (2.33s vs 4.07s).

When should I use Devstral 2 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Choose based on your priorities: Devstral 2 for lower cost, MiMo-V2.5-Pro for stronger benchmark performance, and Devstral 2 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.