Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, High Effort) | Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.14 | $0.08 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.28 | $0.29 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.13/M tokens vs $0.17/M for DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, High Effort).
DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, High Effort) wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 70 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, High Effort) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 1.28s).
Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, High Effort) for stronger benchmark performance, and Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.