Compare/DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs o3

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32Bvso3

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT
OpenAI

o3

Input
$2/M
Output
$8/M
Speed
125 tok/s
TTFT
6.65s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Faster (tok/s)
o3
Lower Latency
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Benchmarks (0-11)
o3

Pricing Comparison

MetricDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32Bo3
Input ($/M tokens)$0$2
Output ($/M tokens)$0$8
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B$0.00
o3$2.80

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
o3
125 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
o3
6.65s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
11.030.4
Coding Index
Math Index
63.088.3
GPQA Diamond
61.5%82.7%
MMLU-Pro
73.9%85.3%
LiveCodeBench
27.0%80.8%
AIME 2025
63.0%88.3%
MATH-500
94.1%99.2%
Humanity's Last Exam
5.5%20.0%
SciCode
37.6%41.0%
IFBench
22.9%71.4%
TerminalBench
37.1%
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B0 wins
11 winso3

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or o3?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.00/M tokens vs $3.50/M for o3.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

o3 wins 11 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

o3 generates tokens faster at 125 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B also has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 6.65s).

When should I use DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs o3?

Choose based on your priorities: DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B for lower cost, o3 for stronger benchmark performance, and o3 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.