Compare/DeepSeek LLM 67B Chat (V1) vs o3

DeepSeek LLM 67B Chat (V1)vso3

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

DeepSeek

DeepSeek LLM 67B Chat (V1)

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT
OpenAI

o3

Input
$2/M
Output
$8/M
Speed
125 tok/s
TTFT
6.65s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
DeepSeek LLM 67B Chat (V1)
Faster (tok/s)
o3
Lower Latency
DeepSeek LLM 67B Chat (V1)
Benchmarks (0-11)
o3

Pricing Comparison

MetricDeepSeek LLM 67B Chat (V1)o3
Input ($/M tokens)$0$2
Output ($/M tokens)$0$8
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
DeepSeek LLM 67B Chat (V1)$0.00
o3$2.80

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
DeepSeek LLM 67B Chat (V1)
o3
125 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
DeepSeek LLM 67B Chat (V1)
o3
6.65s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
3.030.4
Coding Index
Math Index
88.3
GPQA Diamond
82.7%
MMLU-Pro
85.3%
LiveCodeBench
80.8%
AIME 2025
88.3%
MATH-500
99.2%
Humanity's Last Exam
20.0%
SciCode
41.0%
IFBench
71.4%
TerminalBench
37.1%
DeepSeek LLM 67B Chat (V1)0 wins
11 winso3

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek LLM 67B Chat (V1) or o3?

DeepSeek LLM 67B Chat (V1) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.00/M tokens vs $3.50/M for o3.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

o3 wins 11 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for DeepSeek LLM 67B Chat (V1). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

o3 generates tokens faster at 125 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. DeepSeek LLM 67B Chat (V1) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 6.65s).

When should I use DeepSeek LLM 67B Chat (V1) vs o3?

Choose based on your priorities: DeepSeek LLM 67B Chat (V1) for lower cost, o3 for stronger benchmark performance, and o3 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.