Compare/Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) vs Command-R+ (Apr '24)

Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)vsCommand-R+ (Apr '24)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Anthropic

Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)

Input
$3/M
Output
$15/M
Speed
TTFT
Cohere

Command-R+ (Apr '24)

Input
$3/M
Output
$15/M
Speed
TTFT

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Tie
Faster (tok/s)
Tie
Lower Latency
Tie
Benchmarks (10-1)
Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

MetricClaude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)Command-R+ (Apr '24)
Input ($/M tokens)$3$3
Output ($/M tokens)$15$15
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)$4.50
Command-R+ (Apr '24)$4.50

Speed Comparison

Speed data not available for these models.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
25.53.0
Coding Index
Math Index
38.0
GPQA Diamond
68.3%32.3%
MMLU-Pro
83.7%43.2%
LiveCodeBench
44.9%12.2%
AIME 2025
38.0%
MATH-500
93.4%27.9%
Humanity's Last Exam
4.0%4.5%
SciCode
37.3%11.8%
IFBench
45.4%
TerminalBench
27.3%
Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)10 wins
1 winsCommand-R+ (Apr '24)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) or Command-R+ (Apr '24)?

Both models have similar pricing. Check the detailed breakdown above for input vs output token costs.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) wins 10 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 1 for Command-R+ (Apr '24). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Both models have comparable generation speeds.

When should I use Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) vs Command-R+ (Apr '24)?

Choose based on your priorities: both are similarly priced, Claude 4 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and both have comparable speed. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.